for "good morning america," steve osunsami, abc news. atlanta. >>> okay, let's get more now from "gma" legal analyst dan abrams. welcome back. dan, well, those tapes seem pretty incriminating. are they enough to prove extortion? >> the prosecutors think they are. to prove extortion you have to have a threat with the intent to overcome someone's free will, right? and the prosecutors here will say, clearly, the family didn't want to pay this money. this was against their free will. they were being threatened. that's the definition of extortion. now, sounds like the defense here is going to be something along the lines that there was a misunderstanding as to exactly what she meant, that she wasn't threatening, et cetera. so every detail in those tapes is going to become very relevant. but i think this is the kind of case that you might see them reach an agreement before this goes to trial. >> i guess the agreement would be something about turning over the letters once and for all. >> remember, she still has all those letters. so the family